Why do you ppl include the following as trance?

Andy P · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 3:01 am

I'm sick and tired of people on here saying Ian Van Dahl, Flip N Fill, Lasgo and other SHITE groups as trance. They never were trance and never will be trance, will you stop posting about them on this board because it's plain wrong to call it trance. If you want to post about it, use the proper term that it should be called TRASH!

thanks for your cooperation.

((-&E-)) · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:26 am

.. and whats wrong with ian van dahl ?? Rolling Eyes

most tracks are true "hands up in the air" styletracks.. proper good to hear in night clubs... Laughing

if "castles in the sky" ever comes on anywhere.. the whole fcuking place will dance like pr*cks..

.. and btw.. i wud class them as trance... but i guess they are on the dancey end of the trance genre Wink

((-&E-)) · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:28 am

oops didnt mean to post twice.. hehe Razz

QbIx · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 11:00 am

Ian Van Dahl ect. I would, say is not Trance in it's truest form it's more of a hybrid what I call Pop-Trance

DJ_Null · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 12:06 pm

lol!
Ian van Dahl, Sylver, Lasgo and others are just european dance, derived from Trance I think, but too commercial. All 4 of them come from Belgium, so their music is very similar.

I agree with what you said...

inrsoul · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:06 pm

commercial music. it's like cans of spam at the supermarket.

Darion · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 4:36 pm

davehart · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 5:37 pm

E. Mitchell · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 5:58 pm

It does give trance a bad name for sure. I like to call it cheese.

Andy P · **Posted:** Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:28 pm

nice to see people not fooled.

Steven H · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 12:40 am

I dont refer to them as trance, but I can see where people get the idea from, its because these compilations like Ultimate Trance 2004 and Trance Anthems 2004 and Club Anthems has trance in its slogen etc... and all these compilations have songs by these artists on them... so the big companies who put out these compilations play a big part in it also...

technics · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:46 am

technics · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:51 am

Trancemaster · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 7:55 am

Castles in the sky is a trance song in its remixes, but as origin its just a usual dance track even though its very good, but all the remixes are even better, and you can find hard trance remixes, melodic trance and god knows what more you can find,

Stream · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:05 am

Oren · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 11:25 am

its trance, commercial trance! if you choose not to like it - its your decision...

good day Cool

MikeH · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 11:40 am

Some people in this thread need to get a clue. They are commerical dance. The more "energetic" side of Pop. I cannot believe some of the posts I hav read in this thread.

Steven H · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 1:19 pm

Its crazzzy

LACERISE · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 5:46 pm

((-&E-)) · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 7:04 pm

Spherix · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 8:24 pm

davehart · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:08 pm

commercial dance, euro pop whatever you want to pigeon hole it as. There have been a few artists do remixes for the commercial producers, lange & M.I.K.E have both done mixes for Ian van Dahl. Just because they do a mix for them does not class them as what the original tune is.

Andy P · **Posted:** Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:33 pm

If companies want to sell it and ppl buy it, go ahead but I'm sick of marketing ppl syaing TRANCE when it is not then again it won't change.

Spherix · **Posted:** Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:16 am

Yungstar · **Posted:** Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:19 am

narcism · **Posted:** Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:00 pm

its just euro-cheese

this is how it goes

bad- - - - - - - - - - sorta ok - - - - - - - - - - good

they are two completely different worlds

LACERISE · **Posted:** Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:22 pm

Ola guys u make me laugh, tell me the difference between a commercial trance tune and an underground trance trax ? the promotion ? the sound...lol, every artists use the same material, sounds...etc....

I just want u to tell me wich artists are good trance maker and wich are bad or commercial Wink

just to compare...

and don't give me Britney Spears for example Laughing

Viceroy · **Posted:** Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:32 am

Who freakin' cares? It all depends on your point of view anyway. Very Happy

Rakio · **Posted:** Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:29 pm

Never heard any of those artist but I guess its all about the money?

davehart · **Posted:** Thu Dec 04, 2003 1:00 am